Coalition opposes legislation on fake news, hate speech in Cameroon, Nigeria, and Ethiopia
A coalition of 47 organisations has urged African countries contemplating fake news and hate speech laws including Nigeria, Ethiopia, Cameroon and The Gambia to drop policies and legislations that could affect their citizen’s freedom of opinion and expression.
“We hereby call on the respective policy-making institutions and agencies in Cameroon, Ethiopia, Gambia, Nigeria, and other African countries that are considering similar rights-hurting bills, to take steps to discontinue and drop all draft legislations with provisions that would negatively impact how people participate online and use digital platforms,” the coalition said in a joint statement.
“We encourage States to adopt an open process that accommodates the views of everyone, especially civil society, towards the enactment of new laws or revision of existing ones, and ensure draft legislation does not have the potential to infringe on the fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens.”
The coalition which includes Paradigm Initiative, BudgIT Foundation and Enough is Enough (EiE) from Nigeria posited that the legislative actions on fake news and hate speech are without regard to their obligations to Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to protect the right of their citizens to freedom of opinion and expression.
Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights includes the right to receive and impart, regardless of frontiers, information, and ideas through any media whatsoever.
The coalition opined that the attempts to regulate the use of social media through overarching legislation is to “mask human rights violations and create barriers to long-term stability and peaceful dialogue.”
They said such proposals must provide columns for judicial oversight, saying safeguards are essential to prevent unaccountable and overzealous censorship.
The coalition called on the United Nations and African regional organizations such as the African Union, African Commission on Human and People’s Rights to prevail on States to stay true to their commitments to international obligations to protect the rights of their citizens at all times.
In Nigeria, there has been an onslaught of anti-democratic draft bills within the past few months. In October, the Nigerian Senate introduced the Communication Service Tax Bill sponsored by the Chairman of the Senate Committee on the Nigerian Army. The bill proposes a monthly tax burden on users of electronic communications services including services such as voice calls, SMS, MMS, pay-per-view services, and internet communication services.
In November, the Senate introduced the Protection from Internet Falsehood and Manipulations Bill, 2019 sponsored by Mohammed Sani Musa. This bill seeks to regulate communications in cyberspace. The Senator mentioned that the bill is being presented for ‘patriotic Nigerians’ who want peace for the country. The bill punishes the transmission of false facts online, the provision of services to transmit falsehood, and the failure of firms and telcos to check abuses via their platforms.
Another bill that has raised concerns of pro-democratic organizations and citizens alike is The National Commission for the Prohibition of Hate Speeches Bill 2019 also introduced in November. The bill seeks to establish an Independent National Commission for Hate Speech, which would be empowered to enforce the laws and advise the federal government. The bill prescribes a range of punishments including death by hanging for perpetrators of hate speech. The danger of the passage of this bill and the Protection from Internet Falsehood and Manipulations Bill is even more amplified by the flagrant treatment of critical or dissident speech as hate speech by government officials in Nigeria.
Despite strong criticism, Nigeria’s Information minister insists the country will go ahead with proposed social media regulation through amendments to the country’s broadcasting code to regulate online mediums. Civil Society Organizations working in Nigeria have expressed concerns that the ministry is using the broadcasting code, which is secondary legislation as a decoy to avoid public scrutiny on the proposed amendments.
Culled from The Guardian, Nigeria